Back to Weekly Market Monitors

Weekly Dry Market Monitor: Week 36, 2026

Dry bulk
September 9, 2026

SPOTLIGHT OF THE WEEK

Capesize in Focus — C3 at a Multi-Year High as Ordering Accelerates

The Capesize market strengthened sharply over the week, led by sustained momentum in the Atlantic. The Baltic Capesize Index (BCI) rose by 950 points to 6,286, while average C5TC earnings increased by $8,612 to approximately $53,508 per day. The strongest movement was recorded on the C3 Tubarão–Qingdao route, where freight climbed by $3.19 week on week, or around 8%, to a multi-year high of $41.55/mt on 4 September. The benchmark is now trading approximately 70% above its September 2025 average of $24.50/mt, reflecting considerably firmer Atlantic conditions than during the corresponding period last year.

Figure 1: C3 (Tubarao-Qingdao) spot at a multi-year high (left) alongside annual Capesize ordering — 2026 year-to-date contracting already exceeds full-year 2024 and 2025 (right) (Source: Signal).

The southern (Tubarao) system has been getting busier: Tubarao–China sailings over January–August total 127, up from 110 in 2025 and 90 in 2024 (about +15% year-on-year), with the monthly cadence above 2024 in seven of the eight months, while northern Ponta da Madeira sailings eased (234 versus 256 in 2025). Longer-haul southern cargo keeps Capesizes employed for more tonne-days, tightening the Atlantic even without a headline volume surge.

Stronger earnings coincide with renewed contracting. Capesize newbuilding orders have reached 123 vessels so far in 2026, already exceeding the full-year totals of 103 in 2024 and 115 in 2025. Chinese yards account for approximately 117 of this year’s orders. The increase points to renewed owner confidence in the segment and will add to Capesize fleet capacity over the longer term. In the near term, however, shipyard delivery schedules mean that the additional supply will have limited bearing on current Atlantic availability.

FREIGHT MARKET OVERVIEW | BDI & SEGMENT METRICS

Figure 2: Baltic Dry Index — spot rate summary across segments and BDI performance as of 4 Sep 2026 (Source: Signal).

A broad, demand-driven market expansion. The BDI advanced to 3,628 points (+140 daily, +442 WoW), supported by positive momentum across all four vessel classes. The Capesize sector recorded significant gains, with the BCI rising to 6,286 (+950 WoW) and mean C5TC earnings increasing to approximately $53,508 per day (+$8,612 WoW). Panamax rates strengthened (BPI 2,448, +133 WoW), as did those for Supramax (BSI 1,675, +28 WoW) and Handysize (BHSI 900, +19 WoW) vessels. Notably, this rate appreciation occurred concurrently with an expansion in open tonnage across all segments (as detailed in the ballaster table below). The simultaneous growth in freight rates and available ballaster capacity indicates that market strength is attributable to expanding demand rather than constrained vessel supply.

Ballasters — week-on-week by region

Global ballaster fleet and regional counts, with change vs the previous week (Source: Signal).

Open tonnage rose in every segment week-on-week — Supramax most of all (+24% to 772, led by the North Atlantic +44% and Australasia +37%), followed by Panamax (+10% to 820) and Capesize and Handysize (both +9%, to 624 and 714). 

CAPESIZE | ANALYSIS

Freight. The BCI surged to 6,286 (−141 day-on-day; +950 week-on-week) with average C5TC earnings up to $53,508/day (+$8,612 WoW). The Atlantic led: C3 (Tubarao–Qingdao) rose to $41.55/mt (+$3.19 WoW), and the Cont-Med and transatlantic rounds jumped (C9_182 +$12,722, C16_182 +$9,917, C8_182 +$8,887 WoW), while C5 (West Australia–Qingdao) added $2.03 WoW to $18.21/mt.

Figure 3: Baltic Capesize Index (BCI) — spot rate summary and BCI performance (Source: Signal).

Ballasters vs the previous week. The global Capesize ballaster count rose 9% WoW to 624, with builds in Australasia (+17% to 234), the South Atlantic (+17% to 54), and the North Atlantic (+16% to 36); the Indian Ocean/South Africa was flat (−1% to 163).

Figure 4: Capesize — Global ballaster fleet and regional positioning (Source: Signal).

Supply/demand by route C3 (Tubarao–Qingdao) has tightened: cumulative supply now sits below expected demand across the whole forward window, where a week earlier it edged into a slight late surplus — a clear supportive shift behind the C3 rally. C5 (West Australia–Qingdao) is little changed, near balance early and building a supply surplus from around day 12.

Figure 5: Capesize — C3 & C5 forward balance: cumulative Supply vs Expected Demand over days forward (Source: Signal).

Supply/demand — market-position indicator. Demand is running at 103.50 versus a year ago and supply at 98.36, so the demand-to-supply pace held at 1.05, unchanged on the week. A reading above 1.00 means tonne-mile demand is growing faster year-on-year than available tonnage (adjusted for VLOC tonnage on long-term contract, 13.2% of the total; 1.05 vs 1.04 unadjusted). With six of seven loading days in and only one past revision to test against, the side of 1.00 may still shift as the week settles — this is a market-position indicator, not a freight forecast.

Figure 6: Capesize — demand-to-supply ratio (LHS bars, four-week-average YoY growth; above 1.00 = tonne-mile demand growing faster than available tonnage) vs weekly TC earnings (RHS line). Shaded = latest provisional weeks. (Source: Baltic Exchange; Signal Ocean — Voyage API, Vessel Daily Status). (Source: Signal).

PANAMAX | ANALYSIS

Freight. The BPI rose to 2,448 (−9 day-on-day; +133 week-on-week), and the P5TC average gained $1,201 WoW to $22,035/day. The rally was broad, led by the Pacific — P3A_82 +$2,294, P5_82 +$2,213 WoW — with P2A_82 +$1,054 and the grain routes firmer (P7 US Gulf–Qingdao $75.89/mt, +$2.04 WoW).

Figure 7: Baltic Panamax Index (BPI) — spot rate summary and BPI performance (Source: Signal).

Ballasters vs the previous week. The global Panamax ballaster count rose 10% WoW to 820, with builds in Australasia (+19% to 202), the North Atlantic (+13% to 116) and FEAST/NOPAC (+12% to 210); the South Atlantic was steady (+3% to 70).

Figure 8: Panamax — Global ballaster fleet and regional positioning (Source: Signal).

Supply/demand by route P3 and P6 show the clearest tightening, with expected demand rising above cumulative supply over the forward horizon. P5 initially carries more supply than expected demand, but that advantage narrows and reverses toward the end of the period. P1/P2/P7 is the most balanced route group, with total supply and expected demand converging at the endpoint. 

Figure 9: Panamax — P1/P2/P7, P3, P5 & P6: cumulative Supply vs Expected Demand over days forward (Source: Signal).

Supply/demand — market-position indicator. Demand at 95.39 against supply at 102.18 eased the ratio to 0.93 from 0.94 a week earlier; the last fully settled week (13 August) stood at 0.85. The ratio sits below 1.00 by 0.07 — within the largest move a settled week has made on revision (0.07 across 26 revisions) — so the side may still change as the week settles.

Figure 10: Panamax — demand-to-supply ratio (LHS bars, four-week-average YoY growth; above 1.00 = tonne-mile demand growing faster than available tonnage) vs weekly TC earnings (RHS line). Shaded = latest provisional weeks. (Source: Baltic Exchange; Signal Ocean — Voyage API, Vessel Daily Status). (Source: Signal).

SUPRAMAX | ANALYSIS

Freight. The BSI firmed to 1,675 (+7 day-on-day; +28 week-on-week), led by the US Gulf — S1C (US Gulf–China/Japan) +$2,025 and S4A (US Gulf–Skaw-Passero) +$1,512 WoW — with Asia routes also higher (S2 +$563, S8 +$532, S15 +$578); the S10TC average rose $358 WoW to $19,143/day, though the Continent backhaul S4B eased (−$397).

Figure 11: Baltic Supramax Index (BSI) — spot rate summary and BSI performance (Source: Signal).

Ballasters vs the previous week. The global Supramax ballaster count jumped 24% WoW to 772 — the largest build of any segment — led by the North Atlantic (+44% to 135) and Australasia (+37% to 203), with FEAST/NOPAC +19% to 223.

Figure 12: Supramax — Global ballaster fleet and regional positioning (Source: Signal).

Supply/demand by route Little changed, and that is the point: S4A/S1C, S4B and S8/S10 all keep a clear cumulative supply surplus — notably on the very US Gulf routes whose spot rates spiked — while S5 shows only a mild late surplus. The rate strength is running ahead of a forward balance that remains long.

Figure 13: Supramax — S4A/S1C, S4B, S5 & S8/S10: cumulative Supply vs Expected Demand over days forward (Source: Signal).

Supply/demand — market-position indicator. Demand at 85.95 against supply at 101.04 eased the ratio to 0.85 from 0.89 a week earlier (13 August: 0.88). It sits 0.15 below 1.00, further than the largest settled revision (0.12), though the revision size is not established enough to settle that side.

Figure 14: Supramax — demand-to-supply ratio (LHS bars, four-week-average YoY growth; above 1.00 = tonne-mile demand growing faster than available tonnage) vs weekly TC earnings (RHS line). Shaded = latest provisional weeks. (Source: Baltic Exchange; Signal Ocean — Voyage API, Vessel Daily Status). (Source: Signal).

HANDYSIZE | ANALYSIS

Freight. The BHSI rose to 900 (+7 day-on-day; +19 week-on-week), led by an Atlantic rebound — HS3_38 (Rio de Janeiro–Recalada) +$856, HS4_38 (US Gulf) +$850 and HS2_38 (Skaw-Passero–Boston) +$500 WoW — with the Pacific routes modestly higher; the HS7TC average gained $344 WoW to $16,199/day.

Figure 15: Baltic Handysize Index (BHSI) — spot rate summary and BHSI performance (Source: Signal).

Ballasters vs the previous week. The global Handysize ballaster count rose 9% WoW to 714, with builds in FEAST/NOPAC (+21% to 182) and the Indian Ocean/South Africa (+21% to 114); the North Atlantic eased slightly (−2% to 208) but remained the largest pool.

Figure 16: Handysize — Global ballaster fleet and regional positioning (Source: Signal).

Supply/demand by route The segment stayed broadly oversupplied: HS1/HS2, HS5 and HS6 all carry cumulative supply surpluses, and HS7 (Far East) has loosened into a surplus after leading tight in recent weeks. 

Figure 17: Handysize — HS1/HS2, HS5, HS6 & HS7: cumulative Supply vs Expected Demand over days forward (Source: Signal).

Supply/demand — market-position indicator. Demand at 85.97 against supply at 94.78 put the ratio at 0.91, down from 1.03 a week earlier. Handysize demand is built from Voyage API tonne-mile alone, a different basis from the Panamax and Supramax blended series, so the level is not comparable across segments. With six of seven loading days in and one past revision, the side of 1.00 may still shift.

Figure 168: Handysize — demand-to-supply ratio (LHS bars, four-week-average YoY growth; above 1.00 = tonne-mile demand growing faster than available tonnage) vs weekly TC earnings (RHS line). Shaded = latest provisional weeks. (Source: Baltic Exchange; Signal Ocean — Voyage API, Vessel Daily Status). (Source: Signal).

OVERALL MARKET TREND | CONCLUSIONS

Key takeaway: The rally is stronger at the top end of the market. Capesize and Panamax rate gains are accompanied by forward supply deficits on C3 and several Panamax routes. Supramax and Handysize rates also moved higher, but most of their route balances continue to show surplus tonnage, while their demand-to-supply indicators remain below 1.00. The findings therefore point to a two-speed market, with the larger vessel segments showing stronger alignment between freight performance and forward fundamentals than the smaller sizes. 

Maria Bertzeletou
Senior Market Analyst
LinkedIn
Maria holds a M.Sc. in Shipping, Trade and Finance from the Bayes Business School at the City University in London and a B.Sc. in Shipping Economics from the University of Piraeus.
Creating a sustainable world requires us to embark on a journey towards a zero emission future, where every step is a commitment to preserve our planet for future generations.
Albert Greenway
Environmental Scientist, Sustainability Expert
No items found.

Increased Use of Renewable Energy:

Shipping companies are embracing renewable energy sources to power onboard systems and reduce emissions during port operations. Solar panels and wind turbines are being installed on vessels to generate clean energy, reducing reliance on auxiliary engines, and cutting down emissions. Shore power facilities in ports allow ships to connect to the electrical grid, eliminating the need for onboard generators while docked.

Collaboration and Industry Partnerships:

Recognizing that addressing emissions requires collective action, shipping companies, governments, and organizations have formed partnerships and collaborations. These initiatives focus on research and development, sharing best practices, and promoting knowledge transfer. Joint projects aim to develop and deploy innovative technologies, improve infrastructure, and create a supportive regulatory framework to accelerate the industry's transition towards a greener future. The Zero Emission Shipping - Mission Innovation.

To pave the way for a greener future in shipping, the availability of alternative fuels plays a vital role in their widespread adoption. However, this availability is influenced by factors such as port infrastructure, local regulations, and government policies. As the demand for cleaner fuels in shipping rises and environmental regulations become more stringent, efforts are underway to improve the accessibility of these fuels through infrastructure development, collaborations, and investments in production facilities.

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) infrastructure has seen significant growth in recent years, resulting in more LNG bunkering facilities and LNG-powered vessels. Nonetheless, the availability of LNG as a marine fuel can still vary depending on the region. To ensure consistent availability worldwide, there is a need for further development of LNG supply chains and infrastructure. For biofuels, their availability hinges on production capacity and the availability of feedstock. Although biofuels are being produced and utilized in various sectors, their availability as a marine fuel remains limited. Scaling up biofuel production and establishing robust supply chains are imperative to ensure wider availability within the shipping industry.Hydrogen, as a fuel for maritime applications, is still in the early stages of infrastructure development. While some hydrogen vessels have been tested or introduced in the first quarter of last year, the infrastructure required for hydrogen production and distribution needs further advancement.

Ammonia, as a marine fuel, currently faces limitations in availability. The production, storage, and handling infrastructure for ammonia need further development to support its widespread use in the shipping industry.Methanol, on the other hand, is already a commercially available fuel and has been used as a blend with conventional fuels in some ships. However, its availability as a standalone marine fuel can still be limited in certain regions. Bureau Veritas in October 2022 published a White Paper for the Alternative Fuels Outlook. This white paper provides a comprehensive overview of alternative fuels for the shipping industry, taking into account key factors such as technological maturity, availability, safety, emissions, and regulations.

Creating a sustainable world requires us to embark on a journey towards a zero emission future, where every step is a commitment to preserve our planet for future generations.
Albert Greenway
Environmental Scientist, Sustainability Expert

Increased Use of Renewable Energy:

Shipping companies are embracing renewable energy sources to power onboard systems and reduce emissions during port operations. Solar panels and wind turbines are being installed on vessels to generate clean energy, reducing reliance on auxiliary engines, and cutting down emissions. Shore power facilities in ports allow ships to connect to the electrical grid, eliminating the need for onboard generators while docked.

Collaboration and Industry Partnerships:

Recognizing that addressing emissions requires collective action, shipping companies, governments, and organizations have formed partnerships and collaborations. These initiatives focus on research and development, sharing best practices, and promoting knowledge transfer. Joint projects aim to develop and deploy innovative technologies, improve infrastructure, and create a supportive regulatory framework to accelerate the industry's transition towards a greener future. The Zero Emission Shipping - Mission Innovation.

To pave the way for a greener future in shipping, the availability of alternative fuels plays a vital role in their widespread adoption. However, this availability is influenced by factors such as port infrastructure, local regulations, and government policies. As the demand for cleaner fuels in shipping rises and environmental regulations become more stringent, efforts are underway to improve the accessibility of these fuels through infrastructure development, collaborations, and investments in production facilities.

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) infrastructure has seen significant growth in recent years, resulting in more LNG bunkering facilities and LNG-powered vessels. Nonetheless, the availability of LNG as a marine fuel can still vary depending on the region. To ensure consistent availability worldwide, there is a need for further development of LNG supply chains and infrastructure. For biofuels, their availability hinges on production capacity and the availability of feedstock. Although biofuels are being produced and utilized in various sectors, their availability as a marine fuel remains limited. Scaling up biofuel production and establishing robust supply chains are imperative to ensure wider availability within the shipping industry.Hydrogen, as a fuel for maritime applications, is still in the early stages of infrastructure development. While some hydrogen vessels have been tested or introduced in the first quarter of last year, the infrastructure required for hydrogen production and distribution needs further advancement.

Ammonia, as a marine fuel, currently faces limitations in availability. The production, storage, and handling infrastructure for ammonia need further development to support its widespread use in the shipping industry.Methanol, on the other hand, is already a commercially available fuel and has been used as a blend with conventional fuels in some ships. However, its availability as a standalone marine fuel can still be limited in certain regions. Bureau Veritas in October 2022 published a White Paper for the Alternative Fuels Outlook. This white paper provides a comprehensive overview of alternative fuels for the shipping industry, taking into account key factors such as technological maturity, availability, safety, emissions, and regulations.

Ready to get started and outrun your competition?

Request a Demo

Read next