Back to Weekly Market Monitors

Weekly Tanker Market Monitor: Week 40 2026

Tankers
September 7, 2026

SPOTLIGHT OF THE WEEK - India and the Widening Tanker Freight Squeeze

This week’s Tanker Market Monitor tracks India’s return to Iraqi supply as Gulf oil movements recover amid persistent shipping risk. Yanbu is rebuilding its role as an export outlet, but insurance costs and the onward Red Sea voyage remain important constraints. At the same time, freight strength is spreading through Suezmax and Aframax markets in both the East and West.

Dashboard view.  Signal Oil Flows, Iraq to India by export date: monthly volumes 2023–2026, vessel classes, discharge ports and terminals (selection January 2022–September 2026).

Iraqi oil shipments to India more than doubled in September to 4.41 million tonnes, up 106.3% month on month and 13.7% year on year, according to Signal flow data. Russian crude shipments to India fell 32.3% to 5.48 million tonnes, down 12.9% year on year. In the freight market, the latest weekly assessment shows all seven Aframax routes in the basket up 28–73%, while Atlantic Suezmax earnings rose 32–38%.

Chart 1.  Monthly shipments to India by export date, January–September, 2025 vs 2026. Iraq covers all oil cargoes; Russia covers crude oil.

Source: Signal; flow data through 30 September 2026.

MARKET SIGNAL:  Iraqi barrels returned to India in September above their January–February pace, while Russian crude loadings for India eased. Gulf VLCC routes still carry the highest earnings in the crude basket, while the largest weekly gains are West of Suez and across the Aframax routes.

India Takes On More Freight Responsibility

Iraqi shipments to India almost stopped between March and July, falling to 5,000 tonnes in April and 42,000 tonnes in June. The September total of 4.41 million tonnes is just above the January–February average of 4.38 million tonnes. Russian crude shipments to India ran between 7.1 and 9.9 million tonnes a month from March to August before easing to 5.48 million tonnes in September.

Indian Oil, Reliance, Bharat Petroleum and HPCL-Mittal Energy have bought Iraqi crude on free-on-board terms and are hiring tankers for Persian Gulf cargoes. Until recently, Indian refiners had avoided arranging their own tanker voyages through Hormuz and relied on Gulf producers and international energy companies to deliver the crude, paying a premium for that service. Under FOB purchases, refiners arrange the vessel and onward transport, bringing tanker availability and voyage costs directly into procurement. Signal’s flow records show that Iraq–India cargoes have moved mainly on VLCCs, while Russia–India crude has moved mainly on Aframaxes and Suezmaxes.

Yanbu Recovers but Onward Transit Remains Exposed

Crude loadings at Yanbu stopped after Saudi Aramco shut the East–West pipeline on 11 September following drone attacks that Saudi officials blamed on Iraqi militias. The pipeline restarted on 22 September, with loadings resuming in the following days. Aramco then issued its October loading schedule to customers. On 6 October, Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman said pipeline flows had reached 5.8 million b/d, against a capacity of 7 million b/d. These figures measure pipeline throughput, not seaborne exports. Monthly averages of Signal’s seven-day moving average of Yanbu seaborne exports ranged from 4.19 to 4.65 million b/d during April–July, compared with 1.2–1.5 million b/d in the same months of 2025. In September, the seven-day average fell from 3.52 million b/d on 6 September to 0.43 million b/d on 21 September. It recovered to 1.72 million b/d by 30 September, but remained 51.1% below the 6 September level, showing how far loadings still had to recover at month-end.

Chart 2.  Yanbu oil exports to all destinations, seven-day moving average of daily exports, barrels/day, 2023–2026.

Source: Signal; export data through 30 September 2026. The series measures seaborne exports, not pipeline throughput.

On 1 October, a projectile struck inside Yanbu port, causing a fire and a temporary suspension of loading with the reporting tanker before operations resumed. Southbound cargoes from Yanbu to India and Asia still pass Bab el-Mandeb, where UKMTO reported multiple explosions close to a tanker 60 nautical miles south of Al Mukha on 4 October.

OPEC+ and Gulf Supply

OPEC+’s decision to keep November production targets at September levels puts the focus on how much supply producers can restore within existing allowances. The seven participating countries, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman, agreed on 4 October to maintain those targets and reaffirmed their commitment to compliance. Their next monthly review on 1 November will provide another opportunity to assess the recovery, with infrastructure repairs and export access remaining central to the supply outlook.

The August figures show the scale of the recovery still required. Combined production reached approximately 25 million b/d, increasing 630,000 b/d from July, but remained about 5 million b/d below February’s pre-war level. The monthly improvement therefore restored only part of the lost supply. Separately, approximately 2 million b/d of group-wide production cuts remain in place under the wider framework extending through 31 December 2026. Unchanged targets still leave room for actual output to increase where production remains below its allowance, making the pace of operational recovery important to the volumes reaching the market.

The Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee’s 4 October assessment reinforces this operational focus. Its warning that damaged energy facilities require substantial time and expenditure to restore points to a recovery that could remain uneven, while continued threats to maritime routes leave export programmes exposed to interruption. For the tanker market, our assessment is that sustained loading programmes and reliable transit conditions will determine how the production recovery translates into vessel employment. The committee reviewed July and August production data and retained the authority to convene additional meetings or request a full ministerial meeting, preserving flexibility should supply conditions change.

Freight: Gulf VLCC Earnings Lead as Atlantic Rates Strengthen

VLCC: Gulf VLCC routes carry the highest earnings in the crude basket. MEG–Singapore (TD2) stands at $1,448,094/day, up 17.7% week on week, and MEG–China (TD3C) at $1,412,594/day, up 15.6%. The strongest VLCC gains are West of Suez: US Gulf–China (TD22) rose 59.3% to $637,675/day and West Africa–China (TD15) 48.1% to $763,031/day. In the Suezmax market, Black Sea–Mediterranean (TD6) rose 67.5% to $816,610/day, above MEG–Mediterranean (TD23) at $759,117/day, up 24.3%. Atlantic Suezmax earnings also firmed: West Africa–UK Continent (TD20) rose 37.6% to $561,620/day and Guyana–ARA (TD27) 31.6% to $557,189/day.

Chart 3.  Crude tanker spot TCE by route and vessel class, East vs West of Suez, current vs previous week ($/day).

Freight/TCE: Signal, latest weekly spot assessment (CSV export of 9 October 2026). 

Aframax earnings rose across all seven routes in the basket, with weekly gains ranging from 28.3% to 73.2%. North Sea–Continent (TD7) led at $526,895/day, up 73.2%, followed by East Coast Mexico–US Gulf (TD26), up 62.7% to $394,568/day, and Caribbean–US Gulf (TD9), up 59.3% to $347,835/day. Strength also extended East of Suez: SE Asia–East Coast Australia (TD14) rose 50.5% to $252,356/day, while Kuwait–Singapore (TD8) gained 28.3% to $454,235/day. Charterers are splitting suitable cargoes into smaller parcels as larger ships become harder to secure. Signal data show the US Gulf Aframax list falling from 53 to 34 vessels between 28 September and 2 October, a decline of 35.8%.

Chart 4.  Aframax spot TCE, weekly change by route; navy marks the eastern routes, teal the western routes.

Freight/TCE: Signal, latest weekly spot assessment (CSV export of 9 October 2026).

Spot Rate Summary: dirty TCE, VLCC, Suezmax, Aframax and Panamax

Freight/TCE: Signal, latest weekly spot assessment (CSV export of 9 October 2026), $/day. All changes are percentages. n/m means the prior-period TCE is non-positive, so a percentage comparison is not meaningful.

The clean market shows a widening divergence between LR2 and MR earnings. East of Suez, MEG–UK Continent (TC20) rose 7.6% to $281,776/day, while MEG–Japan (TC1) remained elevated at $267,640/day despite a 0.5% weekly decline. Mediterranean–Far East (TC15) recorded the strongest LR2 gain, rising 97.0% to $133,544/day. LR1 performance was mixed, with MEG–Japan down 1.9% and MEG–UK Continent up 0.4%.

All 11 MR routes in the basket declined week on week. The sharpest falls were in the US Gulf: US Gulf–Caribbean (TC21) dropped 51.7% to $29,879/day, US Gulf–Continent (TC14) fell 40.7% to $32,596/day, and US Gulf–Brazil (TC18) declined 31.2% to $43,380/day. These declines qualify the wider tanker outlook: crude-market strength is not being matched across smaller clean tankers. LR2 switching from clean into dirty trading has already added capacity to the Aframax market.

Chart 5.  Clean tanker spot TCE by route, LR2/LR1 and MR, East vs West of Suez, current vs previous week ($/day).

Freight/TCE: Signal, latest weekly spot assessment (CSV export of 9 October 2026). Labels show the current rate and the weekly change.

Spot Rate Summary: clean TCE, LR2, LR1, MR and Handy

Freight/TCE: Signal, latest weekly spot assessment (CSV export of 9 October 2026), $/day. All changes are percentages. n/m means the prior-period TCE is non-positive, so a percentage comparison is not meaningful.

Hormuz Freight Watch: Security Sources Report Highest Weekly Attack Count

UPDATED POSITION:  Maritime security sources recorded at least 12 attacks on oil, LNG and LPG tankers around the Strait of Hormuz between 28 September and 5 October, the highest for any week since the war began on 28 February. Separately, IMO data show nine incidents for the same week; the previous IMO high was eight, in the week of 13 July.

Incident chronology covers reports through 7 October 2026.

1 October: The Kuwait-flagged VLCC Kazimah III was struck by a projectile while transiting Hormuz, following the reported attack on the KOTC VLCC Al Funtas on 28 September. A separate projectile struck inside Yanbu port, briefly halting loading.

4 October: The newly delivered Aframax/LR2 Lipsi was disabled and left drifting after a projectile struck its engine room in Hormuz; the crew was reported safe.

5 October: UKMTO reported that an inbound tanker 11 nautical miles north of Khasab turned back after being hailed by the IRGC and told to turn back or be targeted.

6 October: India’s Ministry of External Affairs said 12 crew were injured when the Panama-flagged tanker On Peace was struck by a projectile while transiting Hormuz.

7 October: UKMTO reported that a tanker had been struck by multiple projectiles about 51 nautical miles north of Madinat ash Shamal, Qatar, and reported casualties. Maritime security reporting identified the vessel as the oil/chemical tanker Acers.

Reported war-risk quotations, 24 September 2026

Quoted war-risk premiums for Saudi-linked tankers calling at Yanbu were around 3% of vessel value, from below 1% in early July, after London’s marine insurance market designated the southern Red Sea as high risk following Houthi attacks near Bab el-Mandeb. Hormuz transits were quoted at 6–9%. For Saudi ports further south, including Jizan, quotes could reach 7%, and McGill and Partners reported some quotations above 7% for calls south of Yanbu. Tankers crossing the Red Sea without a Saudi connection typically paid 0.2–0.3%.

Exposure

Quoted war-risk premiums as a percentage of vessel value. Sources: Quotations reported 24 September 2026;

Reported war-risk cover typically applied to seven-day periods, with quotations reviewed every 24 hours. On a vessel valued at $100 million, the quoted percentages would imply approximately $3 million for a Saudi-linked Yanbu call and $6–9 million for a Hormuz transit for the quoted cover period. Actual terms and agreed premiums vary by vessel and voyage. Sources reported in September that the US military had provided some aerial support to ships transiting Hormuz, while in the Red Sea the EU’s Operation ASPIDES provides maritime protection, with its mandate extended to 28 February 2027. The Saudi cabinet has appointed Saudi Re to lead the country’s marine war-risk insurance pool.

Takeaway

The recovery in Iraqi shipments to India is restoring cargo demand, while refiners’ move to charter tankers for FOB purchases makes securing ships and managing voyage costs a more direct part of procurement. Saudi Arabia’s pipeline recovery also supports cargo availability, although interrupted Yanbu loadings and elevated war-risk quotations underline the continuing uncertainty around export schedules. Together, these developments suggest that recovering volumes can sustain vessel demand before operating conditions improve sufficiently to ease freight costs.

Freight strength is also becoming more geographically widespread. Gulf VLCC routes retain the highest earnings, but the sharper gains in western VLCC and Atlantic Suezmax/Aframax markets suggest that support for crude tanker rates extends beyond the Gulf. Our firm near-term view applies most clearly to crude tankers, while all MR routes in the basket weakened week on week. Recovering loading programmes could add demand while delays and restricted vessel participation continue to constrain effective supply. A sustained rebuilding of prompt vessel lists, supported by shorter waiting and transfer times and more owners accepting affected voyages, would provide clearer evidence that this pressure is easing.

Maria Bertzeletou
Senior Market Analyst
LinkedIn
Maria holds a M.Sc. in Shipping, Trade and Finance from the Bayes Business School at the City University in London and a B.Sc. in Shipping Economics from the University of Piraeus.
Creating a sustainable world requires us to embark on a journey towards a zero emission future, where every step is a commitment to preserve our planet for future generations.
Albert Greenway
Environmental Scientist, Sustainability Expert
No items found.

Increased Use of Renewable Energy:

Shipping companies are embracing renewable energy sources to power onboard systems and reduce emissions during port operations. Solar panels and wind turbines are being installed on vessels to generate clean energy, reducing reliance on auxiliary engines, and cutting down emissions. Shore power facilities in ports allow ships to connect to the electrical grid, eliminating the need for onboard generators while docked.

Collaboration and Industry Partnerships:

Recognizing that addressing emissions requires collective action, shipping companies, governments, and organizations have formed partnerships and collaborations. These initiatives focus on research and development, sharing best practices, and promoting knowledge transfer. Joint projects aim to develop and deploy innovative technologies, improve infrastructure, and create a supportive regulatory framework to accelerate the industry's transition towards a greener future. The Zero Emission Shipping - Mission Innovation.

To pave the way for a greener future in shipping, the availability of alternative fuels plays a vital role in their widespread adoption. However, this availability is influenced by factors such as port infrastructure, local regulations, and government policies. As the demand for cleaner fuels in shipping rises and environmental regulations become more stringent, efforts are underway to improve the accessibility of these fuels through infrastructure development, collaborations, and investments in production facilities.

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) infrastructure has seen significant growth in recent years, resulting in more LNG bunkering facilities and LNG-powered vessels. Nonetheless, the availability of LNG as a marine fuel can still vary depending on the region. To ensure consistent availability worldwide, there is a need for further development of LNG supply chains and infrastructure. For biofuels, their availability hinges on production capacity and the availability of feedstock. Although biofuels are being produced and utilized in various sectors, their availability as a marine fuel remains limited. Scaling up biofuel production and establishing robust supply chains are imperative to ensure wider availability within the shipping industry.Hydrogen, as a fuel for maritime applications, is still in the early stages of infrastructure development. While some hydrogen vessels have been tested or introduced in the first quarter of last year, the infrastructure required for hydrogen production and distribution needs further advancement.

Ammonia, as a marine fuel, currently faces limitations in availability. The production, storage, and handling infrastructure for ammonia need further development to support its widespread use in the shipping industry.Methanol, on the other hand, is already a commercially available fuel and has been used as a blend with conventional fuels in some ships. However, its availability as a standalone marine fuel can still be limited in certain regions. Bureau Veritas in October 2022 published a White Paper for the Alternative Fuels Outlook. This white paper provides a comprehensive overview of alternative fuels for the shipping industry, taking into account key factors such as technological maturity, availability, safety, emissions, and regulations.

Creating a sustainable world requires us to embark on a journey towards a zero emission future, where every step is a commitment to preserve our planet for future generations.
Albert Greenway
Environmental Scientist, Sustainability Expert

Increased Use of Renewable Energy:

Shipping companies are embracing renewable energy sources to power onboard systems and reduce emissions during port operations. Solar panels and wind turbines are being installed on vessels to generate clean energy, reducing reliance on auxiliary engines, and cutting down emissions. Shore power facilities in ports allow ships to connect to the electrical grid, eliminating the need for onboard generators while docked.

Collaboration and Industry Partnerships:

Recognizing that addressing emissions requires collective action, shipping companies, governments, and organizations have formed partnerships and collaborations. These initiatives focus on research and development, sharing best practices, and promoting knowledge transfer. Joint projects aim to develop and deploy innovative technologies, improve infrastructure, and create a supportive regulatory framework to accelerate the industry's transition towards a greener future. The Zero Emission Shipping - Mission Innovation.

To pave the way for a greener future in shipping, the availability of alternative fuels plays a vital role in their widespread adoption. However, this availability is influenced by factors such as port infrastructure, local regulations, and government policies. As the demand for cleaner fuels in shipping rises and environmental regulations become more stringent, efforts are underway to improve the accessibility of these fuels through infrastructure development, collaborations, and investments in production facilities.

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) infrastructure has seen significant growth in recent years, resulting in more LNG bunkering facilities and LNG-powered vessels. Nonetheless, the availability of LNG as a marine fuel can still vary depending on the region. To ensure consistent availability worldwide, there is a need for further development of LNG supply chains and infrastructure. For biofuels, their availability hinges on production capacity and the availability of feedstock. Although biofuels are being produced and utilized in various sectors, their availability as a marine fuel remains limited. Scaling up biofuel production and establishing robust supply chains are imperative to ensure wider availability within the shipping industry.Hydrogen, as a fuel for maritime applications, is still in the early stages of infrastructure development. While some hydrogen vessels have been tested or introduced in the first quarter of last year, the infrastructure required for hydrogen production and distribution needs further advancement.

Ammonia, as a marine fuel, currently faces limitations in availability. The production, storage, and handling infrastructure for ammonia need further development to support its widespread use in the shipping industry.Methanol, on the other hand, is already a commercially available fuel and has been used as a blend with conventional fuels in some ships. However, its availability as a standalone marine fuel can still be limited in certain regions. Bureau Veritas in October 2022 published a White Paper for the Alternative Fuels Outlook. This white paper provides a comprehensive overview of alternative fuels for the shipping industry, taking into account key factors such as technological maturity, availability, safety, emissions, and regulations.

Ready to get started and outrun your competition?

Request a Demo

Read next